Daily Moon Phases

Monday, April 9, 2012

Earth, Prison Planet.

Many sources say this is so. Our spirits are caught in physical forms while the alien mentality works at keeping them imprisoned...we must learn who we are, know thyself, and advance our knowledge of the Spirit in order to leave this material prison once and for all. Here are some excerpts I found:

"Due to the myriad types of naturally occurring global cataclysmic events which are indigenous to Earth, it is not a suitable planet for habitation by IS-BEs. In addition there have been occasional global cataclysms caused by IS-BEs such as the one that destroyed the dinosaurs more than 70 million years ago. That destruction was caused by intergalactic warfare during which time Earth, and many other neighboring moons and planets, were bombarded by atomic weapons. Atomic explosions cause atmospheric fallout much like that of volcanic eruptions. Most of the planets in this sector of the galaxy have been uninhabitable deserts since then.

Earth is undesirable for many other reasons: heavy gravity and dense atmosphere, floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, polar shifts, continental drift, meteor impacts, atmospheric and climatic changes, to name a few.

What kind of lasting civilization could any sophisticated culture propose to develop in such an environment?

In addition, Earth is a small planet of a "rim star" of a galaxy. This makes Earth very isolated geographically from the more concentrated planetary civilizations which exist toward the center of the galaxy. These obvious facts have made Earth suitable for use only as a zoological or botanical garden, or for its current use as a prison - but not much else."
(Taken from - Alien Interview Chapter 9 )

"An in-depth study of the UFO phenomenon reveals that
it does not offer a happy little romp through the titillating
unknown. The UFO appears more and more to be one of
the grimmest realities ever confronted by the human race."
"Charles Fort is perhaps the earliest writer of the twentieth
century to seriously suggest extraterrestrials have
been involved in human affairs" ...."The stories he
collected were of such events as unusual moving lights
in the sky, "rainfalls" of animals, and other occurrences
which seem to defy conventional scientific explanation.
His first two books, The Book of the Damned (1919) and
New Lands (1923), contain a large assortment of UFO
sightings and related phenomena from the 19th and early
20th centuries. Fort concluded that Earth skies were
hosting an array of extraterrestrial aircraft, which he called
Fort developed other theories from his research, several
of which have endured and still remain provocative today.
In The Book of the Damned, he wrote:
I think we're property.
I should say we belong to something:
That once upon a time, this earth was No-man's Land,
that other worlds explored and colonized here, and
fought among themselves for possession, but that now
it's owned by something:
That something owns this earth—all others warned

"This book actually begins where Charles Fort left off.
Mr. Fort speculated that Earth may be the property of an
extraterrestrial society. He further believed that humans might
be little more than slaves or livestock. As a result of my own
historical research launched from an entirely different starting
point, I too, arrived at a similar outrageous theory:
Human beings appear to be a slave race languishing on an
isolated planet in a small galaxy. As such, the human race
was once a source of labor for an extraterrestrial civilization
and still remains a possession today. To keep control over
its possession and to maintain Earth as something of a
prison, that other civilization has bred never-ending
conflict between human beings, has promoted human spiritual
decay, and has erected on Earth conditions of unremitting
physical hardship. This situation has existed for thousands
of years and it continues today."

"In order for me to better discuss these "high tech" "gods,"
it will be necessary for me to invent a new term.
The word "god" alone contains too much undeserved awe.
Historical and modern-day testimony indicates that these
"gods" are as "human" in their behavior as you or I.
The term "ancient astronaut" pigeonholes them into
the distant past, when in fact, they appear to have
maintained a continuous presence all the way up until

The label "extraterrestrial" is too broad.
I cannot name the "gods" after any star or planet from
which they might hail because I will not speculate as to
their place of origin. Furthermore, it is conceivable that
the alleged ownership of Earth may have changed hands
over the millennia, in the same way that ownership of a
corporation can pass among different owners without the
public being aware of it.

That leaves me to invent a new label based upon the
"gods' " apparent relationship to the human race. For lack
of anything better, I will simply refer to them as the
"Custodial" society, meaning that specific extraterrestrial
society (or succession of societies) which appears to have
had ownership and custody of the Earth since prehistory.
For brevity, I will often refer to them simply as "Custodians."

"When we compare ancient and modern ideas about how
mankind came into existence, we find two very different
versions. The ancient version is that an extraterrestrial society
had come to possess Earth and sought to exploit the
planet's resources. To make the exploitation easier, a work
race was created: Homo sapiens. Humans were treated as
livestock and were frequently butchered when they became
too numerous or troublesome. To preserve Homo sapiens
as a slave race and to prevent future rebellion, spiritual
knowledge was repressed, human beings were scattered
geographically into different linguistic groups, and conditions
were created to make physical survival on Earth an
all-consuming chore from birth until death. This arrangement
was to be maintained indefinitely for as long as the
Custodial society possessed Earth.
 In contrast, the modern
view is that human beings had evolved accidentally from
"star stuff" into slime, into fishes, into monkeys, and finally
into people. The modern view actually seems more fanciful
than the ancient one."

"The derailment of spiritual knowledge in Egypt was
caused by the corruption of the Brotherhood of the Snake,
to which the pharaohs and priests belonged. As mentioned
earlier, after its reported defeat thousands of years ago
by its Custodial enemies, the Brotherhood continued to
remain dominant in human affairs, but at the cost of
becoming a Custodial tool.

To understand how the corrupted Brotherhood began to
distort spiritual truth and perpetuate theological irrationality,
we must first look at the early inner workings of the
Brotherhood and its method of teaching.

The original uncorrupted Brotherhood engaged in a pragmatic
program of spiritual education. The organization's
approach was scientific, not mystical or ceremonial. The
subject of the spirit was considered to be as knowable as
any other science. It seems that the Brotherhood possessed
a considerable body of accurate spiritual data, but it had
not succeeded in developing a complete route to spiritual
freedom prior to its defeat.

Brotherhood teachings were arranged as a step-by-step
process. A student was required to satisfactorily complete
one level of instruction before proceding to the next one.
All pupils took oaths of secrecy in which they swore never
to reveal the teachings of a level to any person who had
not yet graduated up to that level. This style of instruction
was designed to ensure that a student did not prematurely
attempt difficult spiritual feats or become overwhelmed by
advanced-level information before he was ready for it,
in the same way that one does not take a student driver
on treacherous mountain roads before the student successfully
navigates easier, but increasingly difficult, highways first.

Imparting spiritual knowledge in this fashion will be
effective as long as the levels are ultimately open to
everyone. When arbitrary or blanket restrictions are placed
on who may have access to the teachings, either through
overregulation, elitism, or by setting near-impossible conditions
for admittance, the system of confidential step-by-step
levels changes from an educational tool into an instrument of
spiritual repression. The Brotherhood underwent just such a
change. The teachings of the Brotherhood in ancient Egypt
were organized into an institution known as the "Mystery

"Brotherhood monotheism was another piece of the Biblical
"revolving sword" to prevent access to spiritual knowledge.
It also allowed the Custodians to greatly elevate their own
status. As part of its new monotheism, the Brotherhood
began to teach the fiction that members of the Custodial
race were the physical manifestations of a Supreme Being.
In other words, Custodians started pretending that they and
their aircraft were the "one and only God." History records that
they used extraordinary violence to make Homo sapiens
believe the falsehood. Few lies have had as devastating an
impact on human society, yet it became a prime mission
of the corrupted Brotherhood, from the time of Akhnaton
to the modern day, to make humans believe that the Custodians
and their aircraft were "God." The purpose of this
fiction was to enforce human obedience and to maintain
Custodial control over the human population. In no case
is this clearer, or the results more visibly tragic, than in
the Biblical story of the ancient Hebrews and their "one
God" named Jehovah.

This here is a cool blog. Check it out.

Alien Interview: "IS-BE"

Friday, April 6, 2012

Get Rid of the NewWorldOrder Government, Which is the Hidden Gov All Over the Planet

Get those idiots out. They are liers, theives, and murderers. How can you call that a governement? Con-men are what they are. Get rid of the new world order who hide in every government on the planet and rule by murdering the good-guys so they can place their alien-manipulated-illuminati in instead.

Here's a story which was posted on April 4, 2012 about the malfunctioning prime minister of Canada....

(besides that link, here's a link to another story which shows how Harper harped all kinds of lies through his teeth. Beside being an idiot about a need for some worthless byplanes called F-ucking nothings, the underground science have technology where flying saucers are built which levitate and move faster than anything known on Earth, and the idiot Harper is saying we 'need'? those junk planes? What a farce. They, the new-world-order-illuminati just want to put people more in debt, steal their money, their lives, and put them in a bad way so they could puppet them at their wish. That's what they're up to. KNOW IT!

http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/04/05/tories-failure-to-reveal-f-35s-true-25b-cost-before-election-political-fraud-ndp/  )


Bob Rae speech: Stephen Harper should resign

OTTAWA—Following is a partial transcript of Bob Rae’s speech to Liberal MPs and staff in Ottawa on Wednesday, in which he slammed Prime Minister Stephen Harper for the waste and cost overruns in the bid to purchase a fleet of F-35 fighter jets.

The speech was intended to serve as Rae’s budget speech — which he was not permitted to give because of an NDP filibuster in Parliament — as well as a reply to recent attack ads by the Conservatives against Rae.

Selected portions of the transcript follow:

“I’ve listened to some lectures from the Conservatives on economic competence. I’ve listened to lectures from the Conservatives on fiscal probity. I’ve listened to lectures from the Conservatives on managing things. And I think Canadians need to know and understand, that this is the worst example of economic incompetence and of fiscal dishonesty that this country has seen in a generation.

And we already know from the way the leaks were put out two weeks ago, the first leak. A leak from the Prime Minister’s Office. Imagine. That doesn’t happen by accident. We know that the leaks that came from the Prime Minister’s Office said something terrible has happened, the Prime Minister was misled.

He was misled by officials — nameless officials.

And the story went on to say that the Prime Minister was privately furious that this had taken place and he was going to make sure it never happened again and was going to be corrected.

Let me just say this about that: the most highly centralized and tightly controlled government in Canadian history; the first government that actually changed its name, officially, from the Canadian government to the ‘Harper government.’ Well, you can’t get away with the fiction that a $10 billion mistake in calculating the cost of the F-35 stealth fighter . . . had nothing to do with the man in charge. With a man whose name and whose moniker is on every single publication of this government.

Mr. Harper, this kind of saying, ‘not my fault, not my job, it was somebody else’s responsibility’ might work for others. It won’t for work for Mr. Harper. He cannot now pretend that he was just the piano player in the brothel who didn’t have a clue as to what was really going on upstairs. . . .

We are frequently lectured on the need for private-sector discipline in government. Imagine, any CEO who’s listening in to this broadcast and imagine any company that made a mistake of this kind — that misled its shareholders, that misled the public, that put out a misleading prospectus, that published false figures and false documents to the tune of billions of dollars. Any company that did those things would fire the CEO and replace the board of directors. The police would be called in and the civil litigation would be huge. The Harper Cons are already in the dock for electoral fraud; this is political fraud of a different kind.

 Let’s just remember some basic things about this F-35 contract, this whole business.

When the government announced the choice of the F-35 in the middle of the summer in 2010, the Liberal party said . . . a tender was required and even then we compared the government’s numbers with what was happening, what was on the public record in Europe, in the United States and among defence experts everywhere, from the congressional budget office to countless European governments, the numbers did not add up.

The numbers were not real numbers. We knew it. We said it. But it wasn’t just us who said it — it was the Congressional Budget Office that said it. It was the Parliamentary Budget Officer that said it. What was Mr. Harper’s answer then? He called us liars. He said we were unpatriotic. Remember, “just visiting”? That was about that. He said we didn’t know what we were talking about. The story he’s putting out now is that he was “misled.” This is truly a pathetic defence. Pathetic.

And it’s not going to work on me. It may work on somebody, but I mean it’s not going to work on anybody who knows Mr. Harper. The control master of all time was misled? All he needed to do was press “Google, F-35” (on his computer) and start doing what any prime minister should do — ask why his government’s numbers were so different from everyone else’s . . . . The $25 billion number was not some deep, dark secret kept under lock and key in the Department of National Defence. It was readily available. It was widely debated by everyone, apparently, except for Mr. Harper, who’s notorious for not caring about details, for not being in charge of the government and for running a very lax and loose, relaxed, “California Steve” kind of government. I don’t think so . . . .

Let others quibble about whether this was dishonesty or whether this was incompetence. But it is not just a mistake. It is a failure. It is a failure of leadership. It is a failure of competence. It is a failure of judgment. It is a failure of honesty. It is a failure to come clean with the Canadian public, when he had countless chances to do so. Every chance was given to him.
Instead of which, what did Mr. Harper do? He stonewalled, he insulted, he pretended he was smarter than everyone in the room. He put out ads attacking Michael Ignatieff, who showed consistency and leadership in pointing out the mistakes of that time. He should be congratulated for it and thanked for it.

When the Parliamentary Budget Officer came out with his prescient report he, too, was denigrated and attacked.

The auditor general has not pointed out anything dramatically new this week. He has simply confirmed what every knowledgeable observer has been saying for two years about this purchase. Yesterday the auditor general told us he was simply doing an analysis of the process. But government departments do not work on auto-pilot and they certainly don’t work on auto-pilot in Stephen Harper’s Ottawa. It is up to Parliament now to draw the further conclusion — the Prime Minister and his ineffective and compliant cabinet failed to show the slightest honesty, integrity or even basic competence in dealing with these issues.

Throughout 2010-2011, the Liberal party kept pursuing this issue. But we were not alone. Throughout NATO, every single sovereign government was coming to terms with an F-35 cost structure that just wouldn’t come down. The Prime Minister of Holland wrote to every member of the Dutch Parliament, explaining that the costs of the project were escalating and that the government would have to review the purchase. Even American congressmen and senators who supported the project admitted that it was becoming much more expensive.

We, for our part, kept asking for more information. Because we knew the government must have that information. We were denied access to the information. We now know the government had the numbers but they withheld them from Parliament. It was, remember, the issue that caused the last election – a contempt of Parliament because the Harper Cons refused to tell Parliament the real cost of the aircraft and the real cost of the government’s prison agenda. It is a contempt of Parliament that continues to this day.

. . .

(Harper) told Canadians not to worry because the government had a contract — those were his exact words — that would protect Canada from rising costs. You know, we’re different from all the other countries in the world — we, Mr. Harper told us, we have a contract. That, my friends, is what any kid in the schoolyard would call a lie. There was no such contract and there is no such contract today . . . .

Any prime minister, including this one, knows full well, that the word contract has a very specific meaning. It’s supposed to be something that binds, something that defines, that protects interests and that can be enforced in a court of law. Mr. Harper was pretending, and he knew he was pretending, all of that when he used that word in the middle of an election. He misled Canadians in order to receive their confidence.

No doubt as time goes on, individuals will be thrown under the bus. We can expect it. A public servant, someone from the military, maybe even a cabinet minister or two. But my friends, we don’t have cabinet government anymore. We have Harper government. And so Mr. Harper has nowhere to hide. He can’t hide behind bureaucrats who have no authority. He can’t hide behind cabinet ministers who have even less authority. He is going to wear this each and every day we’re there. He’s going to wear it and he’s going to pay the price for it.

A mistake of this kind, a massive fraud of this kind, can’t be ascribed to anyone other than the Prime Minister of Canada. This party, this Conservative party of his, this government, this Harper government of his, these policies are his and his alone.

This style of government — the personal attacks, the robotic non-answers to questions, the stonewalling — this contempt for Parliament, this is Mr. Harper’s baby. This is Stephen Harper’s responsibility and this is Stephen Harper’s responsibility alone and he must be seen to pay the price for this deliberate misleading of the Canadian people. And that’s why we say and I say without hesitation: Stephen Harper is not fit to be the Prime Minister of Canada.

To borrow some phrases with which Mr. Harper will no doubt be familiar: Stephen Harper, he’s not up to the job. Stephen Harper, he’s just visiting. Stephen Harper, he’s a failure . . . .

We need to understand the nature of the battle that we’re in and the techniques and the tactics that are used. We now know the Harper syndrome. We know the methodology. We know the technique. And so we all have to steel ourselves and question every single denial, because the denials are intended to do only one thing, to intimidate and to bully.

We have to persevere through the personal attacks, because they are intended to change the subject and to put critics on their back foot. This is what bullies and control artists do. When they are caught out, they say, it’s not about us, it’s about you. Everyone who has ever been bullied knows what this tactic is all about. We have to see through it.

I’m sorry, Mr. Harper, this is about you. It’s all about you.

It’s about your refusing to tell the truth to the Canadian people. It’s about your determination to vilify and attack anything that gets in your way. It’s about your efforts to intimidate and shut down, whether it’s the parliamentary budget officer, non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, women’s groups, human rights groups or people you just don’t like, including Parliament itself. And while these tactics might work on some, they absolutely do not work on us.

And so we face a challenge. It’s not just a challenge in the House of Commons. This is not just some minor error, folks. This is the basis on which Mr. Harper won a mandate. This is about how he won an election. It’s about what he told people in that election. It’s about what he said was true in that election, when he must have known it was not true . . . .

He denigrated, he denied, he denounced. He made personal attacks. He authorized personal attacks on our leaders at that time. He said they didn’t know what they were talking about. He accused people of being unpatriotic. He had ministers stand up and say we were friends of the Taliban.

You’ve met your day, Mr. Harper. You misled the Canadian people, with respect to a contract that’s worth billions and billions of dollars to the people of this country. You’ve denigrated Parliament, you’ve twisted and you’ve turned and you’ve denied. The time of denial is over. It’s time you faced up to the truth and recognized the problem. The problem, sir, is you: you’re the problem.

So we face a battle. We should not underestimate the difficulty of this battle or its challenge. Like everyone who’s in a corner, Mr. Harper is going to start to blame others. He’ll put a cabinet minister’s head on a plate. He’ll put a deputy minister’s or an assistant or an associate deputy minister’s head on a plate. He may even put a general’s head on a plate.

But Canadian people won’t be fooled. Canadian people can’t be fooled. . . .

I’ll tell you who I think should resign. I think Stephen Harper should resign. The buck stops at the top.”